Commentary on Indian Media by Ritendra Bhattacharya
It is often believed that Media is the Fourth Pillar, along with
Judiciary, legislature and executive that is responsible for supporting
democracy. But since the Media organizations are not sponsored by the
Government unlike the other three pillars, continuous flow of revenue dictates Media’s
survival. Moreover media does not exist in a vacuum nor does it enjoy monopoly
power in most of the states. “Sensationalism” can be viewed as a cream that
differentiates various cakes of same taste to get peoples interest and thereby
ensuring the survival of the organization ‘making the cake’ that is Media
Organization. In an environment where 24 hour news channels rule the roost, it
is often very difficult for the media organizations to deliver the news to its
target audience and do it successfully over a long period of time. It cannot be
ruled out that sensationalism of news can hurt the interest or feelings of
certain people or community. To ensure such incidents do not take place privacy
laws are a handy tool for such community. If sensationalism of news is looked
as a violation of the principles of ethical news making, then news
organizations cannot survive in a competitive atmosphere and the society could be
pushed back to the dark ages in such a scenario. Finally it can be said that
sensationalism is an antidote that supports the life process of the media
organization and thereby the democracy and ensures its survival.
Comments
Post a Comment